Off on holiday tomorrow (I know, far too decadent a summer this year!), I really wanted to finish my current read and blog about it before I slammed the car boot down on my suitcases. This is the 27th read of the year and so I might just squeeze in the magic number 40 by Christmas. I've packed optimistically, taking 4 books with me, but I don't imagine I'll be so antisocial as to read them all! But we are staying in an apartment overlooking a lake with mountain views...so maybe sitting still and reading is exactly what we'll all want to do.
Recommended by hubby and child 2, I picked up the first of the roman trilogy by Robert Harris, As you will remember, I read and enjoyed Conclave relatively recently and I have also read Pompeii in the past. I like Robert Harris. He is erudite without being pretentious and he can weave a good story. He is also very personable. He spoke at Henley Literary Festival last year and he came across as friendly, open and modest. (By the way, ticket sales are now open for the 2017 event. It is a well-organised and varied programme; I highly recommend it, even though I am defecting to the North Cornwall Book Festival this year instead...more of that craziness in a later blog!)
The novel opens with a contextual introduction to Tiro and Cicero and quickly develops to centre on a legal case where Cicero is prosecuting a notorious but well-connected Roman aristocrat, Verres. Charged with many cases of corruption and bribery, only Cicero is brave enough to put him through the Roman courts.
Despite my slow start with the novel, I became absorbed in this case. Harris writes succinctly, which I like, but I was a little wrong-footed when part one ended at the close of the Verres court case. It seemed as though that marked the natural end to the novel. I felt as though I had to take a deep breath to enter part 2 where Cicero campaigns to become consul and we follow the progress of his career through two further prominent plots and cases. In fact, there are three identifiable story arcs. Cicero's career development is the key factor that holds the book as a single story, but it was not as cohesive as I would have liked.
This is largely because the book is written from evidence of Cicero's speeches and other Roman scholarly texts. I loved the way Harris used this primary evidence. The authenticity of Cicero's words are undoubted, as the author weaves the Roman statesman's phrases and language seamlessly with his own narration. As the author states in his afterword, "Although Imperium is a novel, the majority of the events it describes did actually happen; the remainder at least could have happened." He goes onto state that it is widely acknowledged that Tiro did write a biography of Cicero which has long since been lost. This gives the novel a sniff of romanticism amongst the realism as Harris creates a voice and temperament for this master of shorthand.
As an introduction to the great Roman families and politics of the time, this is excellent.
I do think that this is more of a history than a novel; but it is a palatably written history that gives insight into the players and fleshes them out as characters. Further titles are described as thrillers, so perhaps the storytelling will dominate the history in the rest of the series. I will wait and see.
So, suitcases are full and I've been optimistic about shorts and sunglasses! I've packed re-reads of Patrick Gale's, Notes from an Exhibition and Anna Funder's All That I Am and new to me are Ian McEwan's Black Dogs and the non-fiction text, Zoo Station, the story of Christiane F. There are some back-ups on my Kindle if I want them, and I always like to see the selection in a holiday cottage before I fully make up my reading mind.
Thanks for reading. I'll update you again once term is under way. My challenge this autumn is to enthuse 16-17 years olds with Macbeth and Hamlet. I have a feeling David Tennant might come in handy!